Author:
González Sergio,Hsieh Wan-Ting,Chen Trista Pei-Chun
Abstract
AbstractBlood Pressure (BP) is an important cardiovascular health indicator. BP is usually monitored non-invasively with a cuff-based device, which can be bulky and inconvenient. Thus, continuous and portable BP monitoring devices, such as those based on a photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform, are desirable. In particular, Machine Learning (ML) based BP estimation approaches have gained considerable attention as they have the potential to estimate intermittent or continuous BP with only a single PPG measurement. Over the last few years, many ML-based BP estimation approaches have been proposed with no agreement on their modeling methodology. To ease the model comparison, we designed a benchmark with four open datasets with shared preprocessing, the right validation strategy avoiding information shift and leak, and standard evaluation metrics. We also adapted Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) to improve the interpretability of model evaluation, especially across different BP datasets. The proposed benchmark comes with open datasets and codes. We showcase its effectiveness by comparing 11 ML-based approaches of three different categories.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Computer Science Applications,Education,Information Systems,Statistics and Probability
Reference62 articles.
1. Benjamin, E. J. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2019 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 139, e56–e528 (2019).
2. Middeke, M., Lemmer, B., Schaaf, B. & Eckes, L. Prevalence of hypertension-attributed symptoms in routine clinical practice: a general practitioners-based study. Journal of human hypertension 22, 252–258 (2008).
3. Castaneda, D., Esparza, A., Ghamari, M., Soltanpur, C. & Nazeran, H. A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. International journal of biosensors & bioelectronics 4, 195 (2018).
4. Lu, S. et al. Can photoplethysmography variability serve as an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information? Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 22, 23–29 (2008).
5. Mukkamala, R. et al. Toward ubiquitous blood pressure monitoring via pulse transit time: theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 62, 1879–1901 (2015).
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献