Abstract
AbstractWe propose a framework integrating insights from computational social science, political, and social psychology to explain how extreme polarization can occur in deeply divided societies. Extreme polarization in a society emerges through a dynamic and complex process where societal, group, and individual factors interact. Dissent at different levels of analysis represents the driver of this process, where societal-level ideological dissent divides society into opposing camps, each with contrasting collective narratives. Within these opposing camps, further dissent leads to the formation of splinter factions and radical cells—sub-groups with increasingly extreme views. At the group level, collective narratives underpinning group identity become more extreme as society fragments. At the individual level, this process involves the internalization of an extreme group narrative and norms sanctioning radical behavior. The intense bonding within these groups and the convergence of personal and group identities through identity fusion increase the likelihood of radical group behavior.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference122 articles.
1. Kubin, E. & Von Sikorski, C. The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 45, 188–206 (2021).
2. Schmidt, A. L. et al. Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3035–3039 (2017).
3. Einav, G. et al. Bursting filter bubbles in a digital age: Opening minds and reducing opinion polarization through digital platforms. Technol. Soc. 71, 102136 (2022). Digital platforms that allow exposure to both sides of an argument are shown to increase open-mindedness and reduce opinion polarization.
4. Del Vicario, M. et al. Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Sci. Rep. 7, 40391 (2017).
5. Del Vicario, M. et al. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook. Sci. Rep. 6, 37825 (2016).