Abstract
Abstract
Study design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objectives
Many individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience autonomic dysfunction, including profound impairments to bowel and cardiovascular function. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is emerging as a potential determinant of quality of life (QoL) after SCI. For individuals with high-level lesions ( > T6), bowel care-related autonomic dysreflexia (B-AD; profound episodic hypertension) further complicates bowel care. We aimed to evaluate the extent of bowel dysfunction after SCI, and the impact of bowel dysfunction on QoL after SCI.
Methods
We searched five databases to identify research assessing the influence of NBD or B-AD on QoL after SCI. Metrics of bowel dysfunction (fecal incontinence [FI], constipation, time to complete, and B-AD) and QoL data were extracted and synthesised. Where possible, meta-analyses were performed.
Results
Our search identified 2042 titles, of which 39 met our inclusion criteria. Individuals with SCI identified problems with NBD (74.7%), FI (56.9%), and constipation (54.6%), and 49.3% of individuals with SCI > T6 experienced B-AD. Additionally, 40.3% of individuals experienced prolonged defecation ( > 30 min). Moderate/severe deterioration in QoL due to NBD was reported by 55.5% of individuals with SCI, with negative impacts on physical, emotional, and social health-related QoL associated with inflexibility of bowel routines, fear of accidents, and loss of independence.
Conclusion
Bowel dysfunction and bowel care challenges are prevalent and disabling for individuals with SCI, with a profoundly negative impact on QoL. Improving bowel management is a key target to improve QoL for those living with SCI.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance [Internet]. Birmingham, AL; 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. Available from: www.msktc.org/sci/model-system-centers.
2. Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, Baxter D, Singh A, Fehlings MG. et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology [Internet]. 2012;38:219–26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22555590/.
3. Inskip JA, Lucci VEM, McGrath MS, Willms R, Claydon VE. A Community Perspective on Bowel Management and Quality of Life after Spinal Cord Injury: The Influence of Autonomic Dysreflexia. J Neurotrauma [Internet]. 2018 May 1 [cited 2021 Sep 3];35:1091–105. Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/29239268/.
4. Szymanski KM, Cain MP, Whittam B, Kaefer M, Rink RC, Misseri R. All Incontinence is Not Created Equal: Impact of Urinary and Fecal Incontinence on Quality of Life in Adults with Spina Bifida. J Urol [Internet]. 2017;197:885–91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28131501/.
5. Levi R, Hultling C, Nash MS, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population. Paraplegia [Internet]. 1995;33:308–15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7644255/.