Abstract
AbstractHow people cooperate to provide public goods is an important scientific question and relates to many societal problems. Previous research studied how people cooperate in stable groups in repeated or one-time-only encounters. However, most real-world public good problems occur in groups with a gradually changing composition due to old members leaving and new members arriving. How group changes are related to cooperation in public good provision is not well understood. To address this issue, we analyze a dataset from an online public goods game comprising approximately 1.5 million contribution decisions made by about 135 thousand players in about 11.3 thousand groups with about 234 thousand changes in group composition. We find that changes in group composition negatively relate to cooperation. Our results suggest that this is related to individuals contributing less in the role of newcomers than in the role of incumbents. During the process of moving from newcomer status to incumbent status, individuals cooperate more and more in line with incumbents.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference81 articles.
1. Hill, K. Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate. Hum. Nat. 13, 105–128 (2002).
2. Hawkes, C. et al. Why hunter gatherers work: an ancient version of the problem of public goods. Curr. Anthropol. 34, 341–361 (1993).
3. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution (Princeton University Press, 2013).
4. Kallhoff, A. Why societies need public goods. Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Philos. 17, 635–651 (2014).
5. Olson, M. Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, 1965).
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献