Feasibility of whole genome and transcriptome profiling in pediatric and young adult cancers
-
Published:2022-05-18
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2041-1723
-
Container-title:Nature Communications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Commun
Author:
Shukla N., Levine M. F.ORCID, Gundem G.ORCID, Domenico D., Spitzer B., Bouvier N., Arango-Ossa J. E., Glodzik D., Medina-Martínez J. S., Bhanot U.ORCID, Gutiérrez-Abril J., Zhou Y., Fiala E., Stockfisch E., Li S., Rodriguez-Sanchez M. I., O’Donohue T., Cobbs C.ORCID, Roehrl M. H. A.ORCID, Benhamida J.ORCID, Iglesias Cardenas F., Ortiz M., Kinnaman M., Roberts S., Ladanyi M., Modak S., Farouk-Sait S., Slotkin E., Karajannis M. A.ORCID, Dela Cruz F., Glade Bender J.ORCID, Zehir A.ORCID, Viale A., Walsh M. F.ORCID, Kung A. L.ORCID, Papaemmanuil E.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe utility of cancer whole genome and transcriptome sequencing (cWGTS) in oncology is increasingly recognized. However, implementation of cWGTS is challenged by the need to deliver results within clinically relevant timeframes, concerns about assay sensitivity, reporting and prioritization of findings. In a prospective research study we develop a workflow that reports comprehensive cWGTS results in 9 days. Comparison of cWGTS to diagnostic panel assays demonstrates the potential of cWGTS to capture all clinically reported mutations with comparable sensitivity in a single workflow. Benchmarking identifies a minimum of 80× as optimal depth for clinical WGS sequencing. Integration of germline, somatic DNA and RNA-seq data enable data-driven variant prioritization and reporting, with oncogenic findings reported in 54% more patients than standard of care. These results establish key technical considerations for the implementation of cWGTS as an integrated test in clinical oncology.
Funder
Olayan Fund for Precision Pediatric Cancer Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference93 articles.
1. Beaubier, N. et al. Integrated genomic profiling expands clinical options for patients with cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1351–1360 (2019). 2. Frampton, G. M. et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1023–1031 (2013). 3. Chakravarty, D. & Solit, D. B. Clinical cancer genomic profiling. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00338-8 (2021). 4. Zehir, A. et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat. Med. 23, 703–713 (2017). 5. Gong, J., Pan, K., Fakih, M., Pal, S. & Salgia, R. Value-based genomics. Oncotarget 9, 15792–15815 (2018).
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|