Abstract
AbstractScientific agencies spend substantial sums producing and improving forecasts of seasonal climate, but they do so without much information about these forecasts’ value in practice. Here we show that financial market participants value the production of seasonal forecasts: options traders price the uncertainty generated by upcoming United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Winter and El Niño Outlooks. Each outlook affects firms throughout the economy, with total market capitalization of $6 and $13 trillion, respectively. A 1% improvement in the skill of the El Niño Outlook reduces firms’ exposure to a one standard deviation shock by $18 billion and induces traders to spend an additional $2 million hedging the outlook’s news. Firms must not be able to undertake ex-ante adaptation that would eliminate their exposure to the forecasted portion of seasonal climate without imposing substantial costs of its own.
Funder
United States Department of Commerce | NOAA | Climate Program Office
United States Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Next generation earth system prediction: strategies for subseasonal to seasonal forecasts (2016).
2. Rep. Lucas, F. D. Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/353. (2017).
3. ECMWF. ECMWF Strategy 2021–2030. Technology Report. https://doi.org/10.21957/s21ec694kd. (2020).
4. Rayner, S., Lach, D. & Ingram, H. Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim. Change 69, 197–227 (2005).
5. Lach, D. & Rayner, S. Are forecasts still for wimps? J. Southwest 59, 245–263 (2017).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献