Author:
Kishimoto Shinji,Hashimoto Yu,Maruhashi Tatsuya,Kajikawa Masato,Mizobuchi Aya,Harada Takahiro,Yamaji Takayuki,Nakano Yukiko,Goto Chikara,Yusoff Farina Mohamad,Iwanaga Yoshitaka,Kanaoka Koshiro,Yada Tomohiko,Itarashiki Tomomasa,Higashi Yukihito
Abstract
AbstractMeasurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery by using ultrasound is a well-established technique for evaluating endothelial function. To make the measurement quicker and simpler than the measurements of conventional ultrasound FMD (uFMD), we have developed a new noninvasive method, plethysmographic FMD (pFMD), to assess vascular response to reactive hyperemia in the brachial artery. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of measurement of pFMD in comparison to that of measurement of conventional uFMD. This study was a multi-center, cross-sectional study. We compared pFMD by a new device using cuff pressure and volume with conventional uFMD using ultrasound in 50 men (mean age, 41 ± 9 years). pFMD significantly correlated with conventional uFMD (β = 0.59, P < 0.001). In Bland–Altman plot analysis of pFMD and conventional uFMD, the mean difference of pFMD and conventional uFMD was 0.78%, and limits of agreement (mean difference ±2 standard deviations of the difference) ranged from −4.53% to 6.11%. We demonstrated validity of the new method for measurement of pFMD, which can automate the evaluation of endothelial function in a short time. Measurement of pFMD is simpler than measurement of conventional uFMD and may have reduced artificial bias compared to that of conventional uFMD measurement (URL for Clinical Trial: https://ethics.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/site/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/eki_giji20221213.pdf. Registration Number for Clinical Trial: E2022-0131).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC