Author:
Zamm Anna,Debener Stefan,Sebanz Natalie
Abstract
AbstractTurn-taking is a feature of many social interactions such as group music-making, where partners must alternate turns with high precision and accuracy. In two studies of musical rhythm coordination, we investigated how joint action partners learn to coordinate the timing of turn-taking. Musically inexperienced individuals learned to tap at the rate of a pacing cue individually or jointly (in turn with a partner), where each tap produced the next tone in a melodic sequence. In Study 1, partners alternated turns every tap, whereas in Study 2 partners alternated turns every two taps. Findings revealed that partners did not achieve the same level of performance accuracy or precision of inter-tap intervals (ITIs) when producing tapping sequences jointly relative to individually, despite showing learning (increased ITI accuracy and precision across the experiment) in both tasks. Strikingly, partners imposed rhythmic patterns onto jointly produced sequences that captured the temporal structure of turns. Together, learning to produce novel temporal sequences in turn with a partner appears to be more challenging than learning to produce the same sequences alone. Critically, partners may impose rhythmic structures onto turn-taking sequences as a strategy for facilitating coordination.
Funder
H2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship
ERC Consolidator Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Levinson, S. C. Turn-taking in human communication–origins and implications for language processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 6–14 (2016).
2. Madison, G., Karampela, O., Ullén, F. & Holm, L. Effects of practice on variability in an isochronous serial interval production task: Asymptotical levels of tapping variability after training are similar to those of musicians. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 143, 119–128 (2013).
3. Nagasaki, H. Rhythm and variability of timing in periodic tapping. Hum. Mov. Sci. 9, 177–194 (1990).
4. Aschersleben, G. Effects of training on the timing of simple repetitive movements. Topics Cogn. Psychol. 135–150 (2003).
5. Krampe, R. T., Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. The effects of expertise and age on rhythm production: Adaptations to timing and sequencing constraints. Brain Cogn. 48, 179–194 (2002).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献