Author:
Matsubara Hisashi,Chujo Shinichiro,Mase Yoko,Muramoto Yukiko,Kato Kumiko,Kondo Mineo
Abstract
AbstractIn electroretinographic (ERG) recordings of zebrafish, the light stimulus is usually delivered by a fiber optic cable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the angle of incidence of the stimulus light from the fiber optic cable will affect the amplitudes and implicit times of the ERGs of zebrafish larvae. The larvae were positioned on their side with the right eye pointed upward. The light stimuli were delivered by a fiber optic cable from three directions of the larvae: frontal 0° (F0°), dorsal 30°(D30°), and ventral 30°(V30°). Photopic ERGs were recorded from 16 larvae at age 5–6 days post-fertilization. Our results showed that the mean amplitude of the b-wave elicited at D30° and V30° stimulation was significantly smaller than that elicited at F0° stimulation (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). In addition, the mean amplitude of the d-wave elicited at D30° and V30° stimulation was significantly smaller than that elicited at F0° stimulation (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.015, respectively). However, the difference between the b-wave amplitudes elicited at D30° and V30° stimuli were not significant (P = 0.98), and the d-wave amplitudes were also not significantly different (P = 0.20). The average b-wave amplitudes elicited at D30° stimulation was 84.6 ± 15.7% and V30° stimulation was 84.8 ± 17.4% relative to that of F0° stimulation. The average d-wave amplitudes elicited by D30° stimulation was 85.5 ± 15.2% and by V30° stimulation was 79.0 ± 11.0% relative to that of F0° stimulation. The differences in the implicit times of the b- and d-wave elicited by the different directions of stimulation were not significant (P = 0.52 and P = 0.14, respectively). We conclude that the amplitude of the photopic ERGs is affected by the angle of the incident light. Thus, it would be better to use ganzfeld stimuli to elicit maximum b- and d-wave amplitudes of the photopic ERGs of zebrafish larvae.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Lieschke, G. J. & Currie, P. D. Animal models of human disease: Zebrafish swim into view. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 353–367 (2007).
2. Robson, A. G. et al. ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 144, 165–177 (2022).
3. Fishman, G. A. The electroretinogram. In Electrophysiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway 2nd edn (eds Fishman, G. A. et al.) 2–28 (Oxford University Press, 2001).
4. Creel, D. & Yu, M. Electroretinography. In Handbook of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (eds Yu, M. & Creeel, D.) 3–18 (Springer, 2019).
5. Naka, K. I. & Rushton, W. A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J. Physiol. 185, 536–555 (1966).