Author:
Oraby Tamer,Tyshenko Michael G.,Maldonado Jose Campo,Vatcheva Kristina,Elsaadany Susie,Alali Walid Q.,Longenecker Joseph C.,Al-Zoughool Mustafa
Abstract
AbstractThe application, timing, and duration of lockdown strategies during a pandemic remain poorly quantified with regards to expected public health outcomes. Previous projection models have reached conflicting conclusions about the effect of complete lockdowns on COVID-19 outcomes. We developed a stochastic continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) model with eight states including the environment (SEAMHQRD-V), and derived a formula for the basic reproduction number, R0, for that model. Applying the $${R}_{0}$$
R
0
formula as a function in previously-published social contact matrices from 152 countries, we produced the distribution and four categories of possible $${R}_{0}$$
R
0
for the 152 countries and chose one country from each quarter as a representative for four social contact categories (Canada, China, Mexico, and Niger). The model was then used to predict the effects of lockdown timing in those four categories through the representative countries. The analysis for the effect of a lockdown was performed without the influence of the other control measures, like social distancing and mask wearing, to quantify its absolute effect. Hypothetical lockdown timing was shown to be the critical parameter in ameliorating pandemic peak incidence. More importantly, we found that well-timed lockdowns can split the peak of hospitalizations into two smaller distant peaks while extending the overall pandemic duration. The timing of lockdowns reveals that a “tunneling” effect on incidence can be achieved to bypass the peak and prevent pandemic caseloads from exceeding hospital capacity.
Funder
Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Majumder, M. & Mandl, K. Early Transmissibility Assessment of a Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China (January 26, 2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3524675 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3524675.
2. World Health Organization. Statement on Novel Coronavirus in Thailand. Jan 13, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-01-2020-who-statement-on-novel-coronavirus-in-thailand.
3. World Health Organization. Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Jan 30, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) (2020).
4. Pan, A. et al. Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA 323(19), 1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6130 (2020).
5. Schuchat, A. Public health response to the initiation and spread of pandemic COVID-19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69, 551–556. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6918e2external (2020).
Cited by
113 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献