Author:
Kenny Ciara-Ruth,Ring Gavin,Sheehan Aisling,Mc Auliffe Michael A. P.,Lucey Brigid,Furey Ambrose
Abstract
AbstractKnowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extracts, while reporting for the first time the metallomic profile(s) of arnica, bush vetch, sweet cicely, yellow rattle, bogbean, rock-tea and tufted catchfly. Key element compositions were quantified using a validated HR-ICP-SFMS method (µg kg−1) and were found highly variable between the different plants: Lithium (18–3964); Beryllium (3–121); Molybdenum (75–4505); Cadmium (5–325); Tin (6–165); Barium (747–4646); Platinum (2–33); Mercury (5–30); Thallium (3–91); Lead (12–4248); Bismuth (2–30); Titanium (131–5827); Vanadium (15–1758); Chromium (100–4534); Cobalt (21–652); Nickel (230–6060) and Copper (1910–6340). Compendial permissible limits were not exceeded. Overall, no evidence of a health risk to consumers could be determined from consumption of the investigated plants at reasonable intake rates. Mathematical risk modelling (EDI, CDI, HQ, HI) estimated levels above safe oral thresholds only for Cd (16%) and Pb (8%) from higher intakes of the respective plant-derived material. Following high consumption of certain plants, 42% of the samples were categorised as potentially unsafe due to cumulative exposure to Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb. PCA suggested a potential influence of post-harvest processing on Cr, Ti and V levels in commercially-acquired plant material compared to wild-collected and farm-grown plants. Moreover, a strong correlation was observed between Pb-Bi, Be-V, Bi-Sn, and Tl-Mo occurrence. This study may support future research by providing both robust methodology and accompanying reference profile(s) suitable for the quality evaluation of essential elements and/or metal contaminants in botanical ingredients.
Funder
RÍSAM 2015 Scholarship
Irish Research Council (IRC) EMBARK Initiative
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Infrastructure Call 2012
Higher Education Authority of Ireland - The Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions
RÍSAM 2014 Scholarship
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference153 articles.
1. Trovato, M. & Ballabio, C. Chapter 1: botanical products: general aspects. In Food Supplements Containing Botanicals: Benefits, Side Effects and Regulatory Aspects. The Scientific Inheritance of the EU Project PlantLIBRA. (ed. Restani, P.) 3–26 (Springer Nature, 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62229-3.
2. Kenny, C., Lucey, B. & Furey, A. Chapter 12: adverse human health effects and regulation of metal contaminants in terrestrial plant‐derived food and phytopharmaceuticals. In IFST Advances in Food Sciences: Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 321–357 (Wiley Blackwell, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119036685.ch12.
3. Larrañaga-Guetaria, A. PlantLIBRA: PLANT food supplements, levels of intake, Benefit and Risk Assessment: The Regulatory Framework for plant food supplements in the EU. Agro Food Ind Hi Tech 23, (2012).
4. Coppens, P. & Pettman, S. Chapter 2: the regulatory situation in europe and other continents. In Food Supplements Containing Botanicals: Benefits, Side Effects and Regulatory Aspects. The Scientific Inheritance of the EU Project PlantLIBRA. (ed. Restani, P.) 27–60 (Springer Nature, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62229-3.
5. FSAI (Food Safety Authority Ireland). Risk management options related to the use of botanicals in food supplements. (2020).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献