Author:
Kim Hong Bae,Zeng Chu Hui,Kim Yunlim,Jeong Seung,Kim Song Hee,Kang Jeon Min,Park Yubeen,Won Dong-Sung,Kim Ji Won,Ryu Dae Sung,Lim Bumjin,Park Jung-Hoon
Abstract
AbstractAs a non-thermal ablation method, irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been widely investigated in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, no consensus has been achieved on the optimal parameters of IRE for prostate cancer. Since high voltage is known to carry risks of muscle contraction and patient discomfort, it is crucial to identify the minimum but effective and safer applied voltage to inhibit tumor growth. In this study, the effect of different applied voltages of IRE on prostate cancer was evaluated in BALB/c nude mice. Mathematical simulation and measurement of the actual ablation area revealed a larger ablation area at a higher voltage. In in vivo experiment, except for the three different voltages applied, all groups received identical electrical conditions: pulse number, 180 (20 groups × 9 pulses/group); pulse width, 100 µs; pulse interval, 2 ms; distance between the electrodes, 5 mm; and electrode exposure length, 15 mm. Whilst the tumor volume initially decreased in the 500 V (1000 V/cm) and 700 V (1400 V/cm) groups and subsequently increased, only a transient increase followed by a continuous decrease until the sacrifice was observed in the 900 V (1800 V/cm) group. This result demonstrated a lasting effect of a higher applied voltage on tumor growth inhibition. The histological, immunohistochemical, and western blot findings all confirmed IRE-induced apoptosis in the treatment groups. Taken together, 900 V seemed to be the minimum applied voltage required to reduce tumor growth, though subsequent studies are anticipated to further narrow the voltage intervals and lower the minimum voltage required for tumor inhibition.
Funder
The Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS) of Korea
The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Rawla, P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J. Oncol. 10(2), 63–89 (2019).
2. Sandhu, S. et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet 398(10305), 1075–1090 (2021).
3. Vernooij, R. W. et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD006590 (2020).
4. Fang, C. et al. Safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation treatment in hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumours: A single-centre experience. Clin. Radiol. 76(8), 599–606 (2021).
5. Wah, T. M. et al. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): A mid-term clinical experience. Eur. Radiol. 31(10), 7491–7499 (2021).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献