Author:
Nagargade Mona,Singh Manoj Kumar,Tyagi Vishal,Govindasamy Prabhu,Choudhary Anil K.,Rajpoot Kuldeep,Kumar Adarsh,Singh Preeti,Sarangi Debalin
Abstract
AbstractHerbicide use may pose a risk of environmental pollution or evolution of resistant weeds. As a result, an experiment was carried out to assess the influence of different non-chemical weed management tactics (one hoeing (HH) at 12 DAS followed by (fb) one hand weeding at 30 DAS, one HH at 12 DAS fb Sesbania co-culture and its mulching, one HH at 12 DAS fb rice straw mulching @ 4t ha−1, one HH at 12 DAS fb rice straw mulching @ 6 t ha−1) on weed control, crop growth and yield, and economic returns in direct-seeded rice (DSR). Experiment was conducted during kharif season in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. Zero-till seed drill-sown crop (PN) had the lowest weed density at 25 days after sowing (DAS), while square planting geometry (PS) had the lowest weed density at 60 DAS. PS also resulted in a lower weed management index (WMI), agronomic management index (AMI), and integrated weed management index (IWMI), as well as higher growth attributes, grain yield (4.19 t ha–1), and net return (620.98 US$ ha–1). The cultivar Arize 6444 significantly reduced weed density and recorded higher growth attributes, yield, and economic return. In the case of weed management treatments, one HH at 12 DAS fbSesbania co-culture and its mulching had the lowest weed density, Shannon-weinner index and eveness at 25 DAS. However, one hoeing at 12 DAS fb one hand weeding at 30 DAS (HH + WH) achieved the highest grain yield (4.85 t ha–1) and net returns (851.03 US$ ha–1) as well as the lowest weed density at 60 DAS. PS × HH + WH treatment combination had the lowest weed persistent index (WPI), WMI, AMI, and IWMI, and the highest growth attributes, production efficiency, and economic return.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. FAO. FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2021).
2. Anonymous. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance (Government of India Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2021).
3. Jamaloddin, M. et al. Molecular approaches for disease resistance in rice. In Rice Improvement, Physiological, Molecular Breeding and Genetic Perspectives (eds Ali, J. & Wani, S. H.) 315–378 (Springer Nature, 2021).
4. Singh, V. P. et al. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Indian J. Weed Sci. 48(3), 233–246 (2016).
5. Biswakarma, N. et al. Five years integrated crop management in direct seeded rice–zero till wheat rotation of north-western India: Effects on soil carbon dynamics, crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 318, 107492 (2021).