Abstract
AbstractAnthrophony is an important determinant of habitat quality in the Anthropocene. Acoustic adaptation of birds at lower levels of anthrophony is known. However, threshold anthrophony, beyond which biophony starts decreasing, is less explored. Here, we present empirical results of the relationship between anthrophony and biophony in four terrestrial soundscapes. The constancy of the predicted threshold vector normalised anthropogenic power spectral density (~ 0.40 Watts/Hz) at all the study sites is intriguing. We propose the threshold value of anthropogenic power spectral density as an indicator of the avian acoustic tolerance level in the study sites. The findings pave the way to determine permissible sound levels within protected landscapes and directly contribute to conservation planning.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Eldridge, A. & Kiefer, C. Toward a synthetic acoustic ecology: Sonically situated, evolutionary agent based models of the acoustic niche hypothesis. In Proc. Artificial Life Conference 296–303 (2020).
2. Truskinger, A., Cottman-Fields, M., Eichinski, P., Towsey, M. & Roe, P. Practical analysis of big acoustic sensor data for environmental monitoring. In Proceedings—4th IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing, BDCloud 2014 with the 7th IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and Networking, SocialCom 2014 and the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Computing and C 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/BDCloud.2014.29 (2014).
3. Almeira, J. & Guecha, S. Dominant power spectrums as a tool to establish an ecoacoustic baseline in a premontane moist forest. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 15, 121–130 (2019).
4. Farina, A. & Gage, S. H. Ecoacoustics: The Ecological Role of Sounds (Wiley, 2017).
5. Sueur, J., Farina, A., Gasc, A., Pieretti, N. & Pavoine, S. Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acoust. United Acust. 100, 772–781 (2014).