Abstract
AbstractMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is closely associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify practical methods that could enable the effective identification of MetS based on anthropometric indices. The basis of our study involved retrospective database obtained from routine medical prophylactic examinations. This was a cross-sectional study on the health status of male workers employed in hazardous working conditions at industrial enterprises in the Ural region conducted in 2019. A total of 347 male workers employed under hazardous working conditions were investigated. The presence of MetS was established by a healthcare professional in accordance with the guidelines of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Simple linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between anthropometric indices and MetS incidence. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios of MetS in relation to increases in anthropometric indices. ROC curves were calculated to compare the ability of each anthropometric index to predict MetS and to determine the diagnostic thresholds of the indicators considered. According to the IDF criteria, 36.3% of the workers had MetS. A direct relationship was found between the individual components of MetS and the anthropometric indices studied. The highest OR was shown by the Body Roundness Index (BRI) of 2.235 (95% CI 1.796–2.781). For different age quartiles, the optimal cut-off values for predicting MetS were as follows: BRI, 4.1–4.4 r.u.; body shape index (ABSI), 0.080–0.083 m11/6 kg−2/3; and lipid accumulation product (LAP), 49.7–70.5 cm mmol/l. The most significant associations with MetS were observed where the values were greater than these cut-off points (Se = 97.4%). The results of this study demonstrated the rapid use of new anthropometric indicators, which have shown good predictive ability and are quite easy to use.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Mottillo, S. et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56(14), 1113–1132 (2010).
2. Zhuraeva, H. I., Kayumov, L. H. & Ubaydova, D. S. The relationship of myocardial infarction with metabolic syndrome. Biol. Integr. Med. 4, 66–77 (2019).
3. Huang, J., Huang, J. L. W., Wang, J., Chung, V. C. & Wong, M. C. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer in Chinese populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis in 57 260 individuals. Lancet 392, S15 (2018).
4. Berkovskaya, M. A. & Dzgoeva, F. H. World endocrinology news. Obes. Metab. 1, 44–57 (2008).
5. Gorbatov, S. Y., Nechaev, O. I., Podchernina, A. M. & Shvets, Y. Y. Economics of obesity. SBI "SRIHOMM DHM". vol. 35, (2022)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献