Author:
Golder Allan M.,McMillan Donald C.,Horgan Paul G.,Roxburgh Campbell S. D.
Abstract
AbstractColorectal cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, even despite curative treatment. A significant proportion of patients present emergently and have poorer outcomes compared to elective presentations, independent of TNM stage. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, differences between elective/emergency presentations of colorectal cancer were examined to determine which factors were associated with emergency presentation. A literature search was carried out from 1990 to 2018 comparing elective and emergency presentations of colon and/or rectal cancer. All reported clinicopathological variables were extracted from identified studies. Variables were analysed through either systematic review or, if appropriate, meta-analysis. This study identified multiple differences between elective and emergency presentations of colorectal cancer. On meta-analysis, emergency presentations were associated with more advanced tumour stage, both overall (OR 2.05) and T/N/M/ subclassification (OR 2.56/1.59/1.75), more: lymphovascular invasion (OR 1.76), vascular invasion (OR 1.92), perineural invasion (OR 1.89), and ASA (OR 1.83). Emergencies were more likely to be of ethnic minority (OR 1.58). There are multiple tumour/host factors that differ between elective and emergency presentations of colorectal cancer. Further work is required to determine which of these factors are independently associated with emergency presentation and subsequently which factors have the most significant effect on outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference78 articles.
1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin 1, 1 (2018).
2. National Bowel Cancer Audit 2017. 2017.
3. NELA. NELA patient Audit 2018 - Rull Report 2018. Available from: https://www.nela.org.uk/reports.
4. Elliss-Brookes, L. et al. Routes to diagnosis for cancer—determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets. Br. J. Cancer. 107(8), 1220–1226 (2012).
5. Sikka, V. & Ornato, J. P. Cancer diagnosis and outcomes in Michigan EDs vs other settings. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 30(2), 283–292 (2012).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献