Author:
Li Wei,Zhang Xiaolin,Li Jing,Yang Xiao,Li Dong,Liu Yantong
Abstract
AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) holds immense promise for K-12 education, yet understanding the factors influencing students’ engagement with AI courses remains a challenge. This study addresses this gap by extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to incorporate cognitive factors such as AI intrinsic motivation (AIIM), AI readiness (AIRD), AI confidence (AICF), and AI anxiety (AIAX), alongside human–computer interaction (HCI) elements like user interface (UI), content (C), and learner-interface interactivity (LINT) in the context of using generative AI (GenAI) tools. By including these factors, an expanded model is presented to capture the complexity of student engagement with AI education. To validate the model, 210 Chinese students spanning grades K7 to K9 participated in a 1 month artificial intelligence course. Survey data and structural equation modeling reveal significant relationships between cognitive and HCI factors and perceived usefulness (PU) and ease of use (PEOU). Specifically, AIIM, AIRD, AICF, UI, C, and LINT positively influence PU and PEOU, while AIAX negatively affects both. Furthermore, PU and PEOU significantly predict students’ attitudes toward AI curriculum learning. These findings underscore the importance of considering cognitive and HCI factors in the design and implementation of AI education initiatives. By providing a theoretical foundation and practical insights, this study informs curriculum development and aids educational institutions and businesses in evaluating and optimizing AI4K12 curriculum design and implementation strategies.
Funder
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Guangdong University of Technology
Kunsan National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Russell Stuart, J. & Norvig, P. Artificial intelligence a modern approach (2010).
2. OECD. Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education, Promises and Challenges. https://www.oecd.org/education/trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education-a6c90fa9-en.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2023. (2020).
3. Touretzky, D., Gardner-Mccune, C., Breazeal, C., Martin, F. & Seehorn, D. A year in K-12 AI education. AI. Mag. 40, 88–90 (2019).
4. Touretzky D, Gardner-McCune C, Martin F, Seehorn D. Envisioning AI for K-12, What should every child know about AI? In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Honolulu, 17 July 2019; pp. 9795-9799. (2019).
5. Ibe NA, Howsmon R, Penney L, Granor N, DeLyser LA, Wang K. Reflections of a diversity, equity, and inclusion working group based on data from a national CS education program. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY, 21 February 2018; ACM, New York, NY, USA; pp. 711–716. (2018).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献