Author:
Mandal Riddhi,Lui Semechah K. Y.
Abstract
AbstractIn the context of fluid-induced seismicity, various injection parameters have been shown to affect fault behaviour differently, although existing studies about their effects sometimes show contradictory results. Aseismic slip is also known to affect seismicity, but its exact contribution remains elusive. To address these, we perform numerical modelling to understand the effects of injection volume and rate on long-term seismic and aseismic fault slip behavior. Our results suggest that both parameters can affect various aspects of fault behaviour to different extents, and, in some cases, their roles are interdependent, thus they should be examined simultaneously in order to fully characterize their effects on triggered fault responses. Within the model space, we observe the fault predominantly releasing aseismic energy, which plays a significant role in altering the timing of triggered earthquakes that follow and exhibits lasting impacts in subsequent seismic cycles. In terms of seismic responses, increasing injection rate enhances the size of the triggered cluster, while increasing injection volume increases seismicity rate of the sequence. Detailed characterization of the patterns of earthquake occurrence and moment release with respect to different injection parameters can offer insights into establishing safe bounds of injection operation and potentially mitigate seismic hazard.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Townend, J. & Zoback, M. D. How faulting keeps the crust strong. Geology 28, 399–402 (2000) (issn: 00917613).
2. Evans, K. F., Zappone, A., Kraft, T., Deichmann, N. & Moia, F. A survey of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in Europe. Geothermics 41, 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.08.002 (2012) (issn: 03756505.).
3. McGarr, A. et al. Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection. Science 347, 830–831 (2015).
4. Nicholson, C. & Wesson, R. L. Earthquake Hazard Associated with Deep Well Injection—A Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency. (US Geological Survey Bulletin 1951, 1990). issn: 00831093.
5. Council, N. R. Induced seismicity potential in energy technologies. 1–248 (2012).