Abstract
AbstractField pea (Pisum sativum L.) needs improvement to increase productivity due to its high price and demand. However, the incidence of powdery mildew (PM) disease limits its production. This study aimed to analyze the diversity of qualitative and quantitative traits against powdery mildew resistance by utilizing cluster and principal component analysis to explore PM resistance high-yield potential field peas. Shannon–Weaver's diversity index (Hʹ) displayed high intra-genotype diversity for quantitative and qualitative aspects. Heterogeneity was identified for resistance against powdery mildew infections. Eighty-five genotypes were divided into five groups using Mohalanobis generalized distance (D2) statistics. The highest inter-cluster D2 value was observed between clusters 2 and 3 (11.89) while the lowest value was found between clusters 3 and 4 (2.06). Most of the genotypes had noticeable differences, so these could be employed in a crossing scheme. Twelve genotypes were extremely resistant, 29 genotypes were resistant, 25 genotypes were moderately resistant, 18 genotypes were fairly susceptible, and 1 genotype was susceptible to powdery mildew disease. Among 29 resistant genotypes, BFP77, BFP74, BFP63, BFP62, BFP43, and BFP80 were high yielders and, could be used directly and/or transferred through hybridization to high-yielding disease-susceptible genotypes. Among the 25 moderately resistant genotypes, BFP78, BFP45, BFP79, and BFP48 were found to be high yielders. In principal component analysis (PCA), the first four PCs with Eigen values > 1 accounted for 88.4% variability for quantitative traits. Clustering sorted genotypes into five groups, where groups 1 to 5 assembled 37, 28, 1, 8, and 11 genotypes, respectively. Genotypes of cluster 4 were identified as high yielders with its attributes. Pearson correlation significantly and positively correlated across all traits except for PM. This variation suggested that there is a mechanism to select promising genotypes for field pea breeding. Considering all features, BFP78, BFP77, BFP74, BFP63, BFP62, BFP45, BFP79, and BFP80 could be preferred as high yielders and PM resistance owing to longer pod lengths, seeds per pod and pods per plant.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference126 articles.
1. Prasad, D., Nath, S., Lal, K., Jaiswal, A. & Yadav, V. P. Evaluation of Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes for genetic variability and divergence. Int. J. Che. Stud. 6, 2288–2291 (2018).
2. Rana, J. C. et al. Screening of pea germplasm for resistance to powdery mildew. Euphytica 189, 271–282 (2013).
3. [FAOSTAT] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. Production of pulse crops: top 10 dry pea producers in 2020. Statistical database. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualized.
4. Pandey, A. K. et al. Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 134(3), 755–776 (2021).
5. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize (2019).