Author:
Rashidi-Khaniabadi Ali,Rashidi-Khaniabadi Elham,Amiri-Ramsheh Behnam,Mohammadi Mohammad-Reza,Hemmati-Sarapardeh Abdolhossein
Abstract
AbstractInterfacial tension (IFT) between surfactants and hydrocarbon is one of the important parameters in petroleum engineering to have a successful enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operation. Measuring IFT in the laboratory is time-consuming and costly. Since, the accurate estimation of IFT is of paramount significance, modeling with advanced intelligent techniques has been used as a proper alternative in recent years. In this study, the IFT values between surfactants and hydrocarbon were predicted using tree-based machine learning algorithms. Decision tree (DT), extra trees (ET), and gradient boosted regression trees (GBRT) were used to predict this parameter. For this purpose, 390 experimental data collected from previous studies were used to implement intelligent models. Temperature, normal alkane molecular weight, surfactant concentration, hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB), and phase inversion temperature (PIT) were selected as inputs of models and independent variables. Also, the IFT between the surfactant solution and normal alkanes was selected as the output of the models and the dependent variable. Moreover, the implemented models were evaluated using statistical analyses and applied graphical methods. The results showed that DT, ET, and GBRT could predict the data with average absolute relative error values of 4.12%, 3.52%, and 2.71%, respectively. The R-squared of all implementation models is higher than 0.98, and for the best model, GBRT, it is 0.9939. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis using the Pearson approach was utilized to detect correlation coefficients of the input parameters. Based on this technique, the results of sensitivity analysis demonstrated that PIT, surfactant concentration, and HLB had the greatest effect on IFT, respectively. Finally, GBRT was statistically credited by the Leverage approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference113 articles.
1. Sagir, M., Mushtaq, M., Tahir, M. S., Tahir, M. B. & Shaik, A. R. Surfactant in Petroleum Industry BT—Surfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications. (eds. Sagir, M., Mushtaq, M., Tahir, M. S., Tahir, M. B. & Shaik, A. R.).13–40 (Springer, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18785-9_2.
2. Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. A. & Puerto, M. Recent advances in surfactant EOR. SPE J. 16, 889–907 (2011).
3. Puerto, M., Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. A. & Barnes, J. R. Surfactant systems for EOR in high-temperature, high-salinity environments. SPE J. (Society of Petroleum Engineers) 17, 11–19 (2012).
4. Aranda-Bravo, C. G., Romero-Martínez, A., Trejo, A. & Águila-Hernández, J. Interfacial tension and density of water + branched hydrocarbon binary systems in the range 303–343 K. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 1476–1483 (2009).
5. Bui, B. T. & Tutuncu, A. N. Interfacial tension induced-transport in shale: A pore-scale study. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171, 1409–1419 (2018).