Evidence from comprehensive independent validation studies for smooth pursuit dysfunction as a sensorimotor biomarker for psychosis

Author:

Meyhoefer Inga,Sprenger Andreas,Derad David,Grotegerd Dominik,Leenings Ramona,Leehr Elisabeth J.,Breuer Fabian,Surmann Marian,Rolfes Karen,Arolt Volker,Romer Georg,Lappe Markus,Rehder Johanna,Koutsouleris Nikolaos,Borgwardt Stefan,Schultze-Lutter Frauke,Meisenzahl Eva,Kircher Tilo T. J.,Keedy Sarah S.,Bishop Jeffrey R.,Ivleva Elena I.,McDowell Jennifer E.,Reilly James L.,Hill Scot Kristian,Pearlson Godfrey D.,Tamminga Carol A.,Keshavan Matcheri S.,Gershon Elliot S.,Clementz Brett A.,Sweeney John A.,Hahn Tim,Dannlowski Udo,Lencer Rebekka

Abstract

AbstractSmooth pursuit eye movements are considered a well-established and quantifiable biomarker of sensorimotor function in psychosis research. Identifying psychotic syndromes on an individual level based on neurobiological markers is limited by heterogeneity and requires comprehensive external validation to avoid overestimation of prediction models. Here, we studied quantifiable sensorimotor measures derived from smooth pursuit eye movements in a large sample of psychosis probands (N = 674) and healthy controls (N = 305) using multivariate pattern analysis. Balanced accuracies of 64% for the prediction of psychosis status are in line with recent results from other large heterogenous psychiatric samples. They are confirmed by external validation in independent large samples including probands with (1) psychosis (N = 727) versus healthy controls (N = 292), (2) psychotic (N = 49) and non-psychotic bipolar disorder (N = 36), and (3) non-psychotic affective disorders (N = 119) and psychosis (N = 51) yielding accuracies of 65%, 66% and 58%, respectively, albeit slightly different psychosis syndromes. Our findings make a significant contribution to the identification of biologically defined profiles of heterogeneous psychosis syndromes on an individual level underlining the impact of sensorimotor dysfunction in psychosis.

Funder

Innovative Medical Research of the University of Münster Medical School

German Research Council

Universität Münster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3