Author:
Ang Andie,Roesma Dewi Imelda,Nijman Vincent,Meier Rudolf,Srivathsan Amrita,Rizaldi
Abstract
AbstractA significant number of Southeast Asian mammal species described in the 19th and 20th century were subsequently synonymized and are now considered subspecies. Many are affected by rapid habitat loss which creates an urgent need to re-assess the conservation status based on species boundaries established with molecular data. However, such data are lacking and difficult to obtain for many populations and subspecies. We document via a literature survey and empirical study how shotgun sequencing of faecal DNA is a still underutilized but powerful tool for accelerating such evaluations. We obtain 11 mitochondrial genomes for three subspecies in the langur genus Presbytis through shotgun sequencing of faecal DNA (P. femoralis femoralis, P. f. percura, P. siamensis cf. cana). The genomes support the resurrection of all three subspecies to species based on multiple species delimitation algorithms (PTP, ABGD, Objective Clustering) applied to a dataset covering 40 species and 43 subspecies of Asian colobines. For two of the newly recognized species (P. femoralis, P. percura), the results lead to an immediate change in IUCN status to Critically Endangered due to small population sizes and fragmented habitats. We conclude that faecal DNA should be more widely used for clarifying species boundaries in endangered mammals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (ed. Díaz, S. et al.) (IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany (2019).
2. Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W. & Ng, P. K. L. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(12), 654–660 (2004).
3. Trimble, M. J. & van Aarde, R. J. Geographical and taxonomic biases in research on biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Ecosphere 3(12), 1–16 (2012).
4. Titley, M. A., Snaddon, J. L. & Turner, E. C. Scientific research on animal biodiversity is systematically biased towards vertebrates and temperate regions. PLoS One 12(12), e0189577 (2017).
5. Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B. & Wilson, D. E. Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Vol. 3, Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain (2013).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献