Author:
Sauer Christopher M.,Gómez Josep,Botella Manuel Ruiz,Ziehr David R.,Oldham William M.,Gavidia Giovana,Rodríguez Alejandro,Elbers Paul,Girbes Armand,Bodi Maria,Celi Leo Anthony
Abstract
AbstractWhile serum lactate level is a predictor of poor clinical outcomes among critically ill patients with sepsis, many have normal serum lactate. A better understanding of this discordance may help differentiate sepsis phenotypes and offer clues to sepsis pathophysiology. Three intensive care unit datasets were utilized. Adult sepsis patients in the highest quartile of illness severity scores were identified. Logistic regression, random forests, and partial least square models were built for each data set. Features differentiating patients with normal/high serum lactate on day 1 were reported. To exclude that differences between the groups were due to potential confounding by pre-resuscitation hyperlactatemia, the analyses were repeated for day 2. Of 4861 patients included, 47% had normal lactate levels. Patients with normal serum lactate levels had lower 28-day mortality rates than those with high lactate levels (17% versus 40%) despite comparable physiologic phenotypes. While performance varied between datasets, logistic regression consistently performed best (area under the receiver operator curve 87–99%). The variables most strongly associated with normal serum lactate were serum bicarbonate, chloride, and pulmonary disease, while serum sodium, AST and liver disease were associated with high serum lactate. Future studies should confirm these findings and establish the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, thus disentangling association and causation.
Funder
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Singer, M. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315, 801 (2016).
2. van der Poll, T. & Opal, S. M. Host–pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 8, 32–43 (2008).
3. Angus, D. C. et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit. Care Med. 29, 1303–1310 (2001).
4. Angus, D. C. & van der Poll, T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 840–851 (2013).
5. Sauer, C. M., Dong, J., Celi, L. A. & Ramazzotti, D. Improved survival of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit between 2002 and 2011 at a U.S. Teaching Hospital. Cancer Res. Treat. Off. J. Korean Cancer Assoc. 51, 973–981 (2019).
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献