Author:
Phan Johan,Sarmad Muhammad,Ruspini Leonardo,Kiss Gabriel,Lindseth Frank
Abstract
AbstractThree-dimensional (3D) images provide a comprehensive view of material microstructures, enabling numerical simulations unachievable with two-dimensional (2D) imaging alone. However, obtaining these 3D images can be costly and constrained by resolution limitations. We introduce a novel method capable of generating large-scale 3D images of material microstructures, such as metal or rock, from a single 2D image. Our approach circumvents the need for 3D image data while offering a cost-effective, high-resolution alternative to existing imaging techniques. Our method combines a denoising diffusion probabilistic model with a generative adversarial network framework. To compensate for the lack of 3D training data, we implement chain sampling, a technique that utilizes the 3D intermediate outputs obtained by reversing the diffusion process. During the training phase, these intermediate outputs are guided by a 2D discriminator. This technique facilitates our method’s ability to gradually generate 3D images that accurately capture the geometric properties and statistical characteristics of the original 2D input. This study features a comparative analysis of the 3D images generated by our method, SliceGAN (the current state-of-the-art method), and actual 3D micro-CT images, spanning a diverse set of rock and metal types. The results shown an improvement of up to three times in the Frechet inception distance score, a typical metric for evaluating the performance of image generative models, and enhanced accuracy in derived properties compared to SliceGAN. The potential of our method to produce high-resolution and statistically representative 3D images paves the way for new applications in material characterization and analysis domains.
Funder
Norges Forskningsråd
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Kampschulte, M. et al. Nano-computed Tomography: Technique and Applications vol. 188(no. 2) 146–154 (Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2016).
2. Groeber, M. A., Haley, B., Uchic, M. D., Dimiduk, D. M. & Ghosh, S. 3d reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a fib-sem system. Mater. Charact. 57(4–5), 259–273 (2006).
3. Xu, C. S. et al. Enhanced fib-sem systems for large-volume 3d imaging. Elife 6, 25916 (2017).
4. Ahmed, H. M. A. Nano-computed tomography: Current and future perspectives. Restor. Dent. Endod. 41(3), 236–238 (2016).
5. CT vs. SEM: Which Is Better?—imaging.rigaku.com. https://imaging.rigaku.com/blog/ct-vs-sem-which-is-better. Accessed December 27 2023.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献