Author:
Mello-Machado Rafael Coutinho,Sartoretto Suelen Cristina,Granjeiro Jose Mauro,Calasans-Maia José de Albuquerque,de Uzeda Marcelo Jose Pinheiro Guedes,Mourão Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros,Ghiraldini Bruna,Bezerra Fabio Jose Barbosa,Senna Plinio Mendes,Calasans-Maia Mônica Diuana
Abstract
AbstractPrimary implant stability is a prerequisite for successful implant osseointegration. The osseodensification technique (OD) is a non-subtractive drilling technique that preserves the bone tissue, increases osteotomy wall density, and improves the primary stability. This study aimed to investigate the hypothesis that OD, through a wider osteotomy, produces healing chambers (HCs) at the implant-bone interface without impacting low-density bone primary stability. Twenty implants (3.5 × 10 mm) with a nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) surface were inserted in the ilium of ten sheep. Implant beds were prepared as follows: (i) 2.7-mm-wide using subtractive conventional drilling (SCD) technique (n = 10); (ii) 3.8-mm-wide using an OD bur system (n = 10). The sheep were randomized to two groups, with samples collected at either 14-(n = 5) or 28-days (n = 5) post-surgery and processed for histological and histomorphometric evaluation of bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). No significant group differences were found with respect to final insertion torque and implant stability quotient (p > 0.050). BIC values were higher for SCD after 14 and 28 days (p < 0.050); however, BAFO values were similar (p > 0.050). It was possible to conclude that the OD technique allowed a wider implant bed preparation without prejudice on primary stability and bone remodeling.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Goiato, M., dos Santos, D., Santiago, J. J., Moreno, A. & Pellizzer, E. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: A systematic. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 43, 1108–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016 (2014).
2. Turkyilmaz, I., Aksoy, U. & McGlumphy, E. A. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: A clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 10, 231–237 (2008).
3. Bilhan, H. et al. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J. Oral Rehabil. 37, 900–907 (2010).
4. Mello-Machado, R. C. et al. Clinical assessment of dental implants placed in low-quality bone sites prepared for the healing chamber with osseodensification concept: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Appl. Sci. 11, 640 (2021).
5. Albrektsson, T., Brånemark, P.-I., Hansson, H.-A. & Lindström, J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 52, 155–170 (1981).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献