Author:
Monninger Maximilian,Aggensteiner Pascal-M.,Pollok Tania M.,Kaiser Anna,Reinhard Iris,Hermann Andrea,Reichert Markus,Ebner-Priemer Ulrich W.,Meyer-Lindenberg Andreas,Brandeis Daniel,Banaschewski Tobias,Holz Nathalie E.
Abstract
AbstractThe coronavirus pandemic has brought about dramatic restrictions to real-life social interactions and a shift towards more online social encounters. Positive social interactions have been highlighted as an important protective factor, with previous studies suggesting an involvement of the amygdala in the relationship between social embeddedness and well-being. The present study investigated the effect of the quality of real-life and online social interactions on mood, and explored whether this association is affected by an individual’s amygdala activity. Sixty-two participants of a longitudinal study took part in a one-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) during the first lockdown, reporting their momentary well-being and their engagement in real-life and online social interactions eight times per day (N ~ 3000 observations). Amygdala activity was assessed before the pandemic during an emotion-processing task. Mixed models were calculated to estimate the association between social interactions and well-being, including two-way interactions to test for the moderating effect of amygdala activity. We found a positive relationship between real-life interactions and momentary well-being. In contrast, online interactions had no effect on well-being. Moreover, positive real-life social interactions augmented this social affective benefit, especially in individuals with higher amygdala being more sensitive to the interaction quality. Our findings demonstrate a mood-lifting effect of positive real-life social interactions during the pandemic, which was dependent on amygdala activity before the pandemic. As no corresponding effect was found between online social interactions and well-being, it can be concluded that increased online social interactions may not compensate for the absence of real-life social interactions.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit (ZI)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Gryksa, K. & Neumann, I. D. Consequences of pandemic-associated social restrictions: Role of social support and the oxytocin system. Psychoneuroendocrinology 135, 105601 (2022).
2. Wang, Z. H. et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptom, and the demands for psychological knowledge and interventions in college students during COVID-19 epidemic: A large cross-sectional study. J. Affect. Disord. 275, 188–193 (2020).
3. Qiu, J. et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatr. 33, e100213 (2020).
4. Daly, M., Sutin, A.R. & Robinson, E. Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Psychol Med. 52, 1–10 (2020).
5. Holingue, C. et al. Mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among US adults without a pre-existing mental health condition: Findings from American trend panel survey. Prev. Med. 139, 106231 (2020).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献