Self-evaluation of automated vehicles based on physics, state-of-the-art motion prediction and user experience

Author:

Stockem Novo Anne,Hürten Christian,Baumann Robin,Sieberg Philipp

Abstract

AbstractLegal restrictions allow to give full control to automated vehicles for longer time periods either in restricted areas or when moving with reduced speed. Although being technically feasible for a wide range of driving scenarios, the restrictions are still in place due to the lack of a clear safety strategy. An essential step towards safety is the introduction of a self-monitoring component. In this study, a self-evaluation concept is presented which assesses a system based on a physics-defined minimum prediction horizon for state-of-the-art Deep Learning-based trajectory prediction models. Since User Experience is a key metric for car manufacturers, a further manoeuvre constraint is added to the model. We emphasize the generalizability of the presented assessment concept, however, in order to demonstrate feasibility in practical use, three specific scenarios are discussed. The results are gained with real data from publicly available driving campaigns as well as synthetically generated simulation data. Two exemplary models, a simple LSTM-based model and VectorNet, a prominent motion prediction model, are evaluated. A quantitative assessment shows a lack of training data in the public datasets for vehicle speeds > 25 m/s in order to offer safe driving above such vehicle speeds.

Funder

Hochschule Ruhr West

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference35 articles.

1. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE J3016. (SAE International, 2021).

2. Strayer, D.L., Cooper, J.M., Turrill, J., Coleman, J.R. & Hopman, R.J. The smartphone and the driver’s cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft’s intelligent personal assistants. in Technical Report (AAA Foundation For Traffic Safety, 2015).

3. Strayer, D.L., Cooper, J.M., Turrill, J., Coleman, J.R. & Hopman, R.J. Measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile III: A comparison of ten 2015 in-vehicle information systems. in Technical Report (AAA Foundation For Traffic Safety, 2015).

4. Mehmed, A., Antlanger, M., Steiner, W. & Punnekkat, S. Forecast horizon for automated safety actions in automated driving systems. In International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security 11698, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26601-1_8 (Springer, Cham)(2019).

5. Stockem Novo, A., Krüger, M., Stolpe, M. & Bertram, T. A review on scene prediction for automated driving. Physics 4, 132–159 (2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3