Author:
Harris Grant M.,Butler Matthew J.,Stewart David R.,Cain James W.
Abstract
AbstractStable or growing populations may go extinct when their sizes cannot withstand large swings in temporal variation and stochastic forces. Hence, the minimum abundance threshold defining when populations can persist without human intervention forms a key conservation parameter. We identify this threshold for many populations of Caprinae, typically threatened species lacking demographic data. Doing so helps triage conservation and management actions for threatened or harvested populations. Methodologically, we used population projection matrices and simulations, with starting abundance, recruitment, and adult female survival predicting future abundance, growth rate (λ), and population trend. We incorporated mean demographic rates representative of Caprinae populations and corresponding variances from desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni), as a proxy for Caprinae sharing similar life histories. We found a population’s minimum abundance resulting in ≤ 0.01 chance of quasi-extinction (QE; population ≤ 5 adult females) in 10 years and ≤ 0.10 QE in 30 years as 50 adult females, or 70 were translocation (removals) pursued. Discovering the threshold required 3 demographic parameters. We show, however, that monitoring populations’ relationships to this threshold requires only abundance and recruitment data. This applied approach avoids the logistical and cost hurdles in measuring female survival, making assays of population persistence more practical.
Funder
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Shackleton, D. M. (ed.) and the IUCN/SSC Capriane Specialist Group. Wild Sheep and Goats and Their Relatives. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Caprinae (IUCN, 1997).
2. Ovaskainen, O. & Meerson, B. Stochastic models of population extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(11), 643–652 (2010).
3. Burgman, M. & Possingham, H. Population viability analysis for conservation: The good, the bad and the undescribed. In Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds Young, A. G. & Clarke, G. M.) 97–112 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
4. Pe’er, G. et al. A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses. Conserv. Biol. 27(4), 644–656 (2013).
5. Ralls, K., Beissinger, S. R. & Cochrane, J. F. Guidelines for using population viability analysis in endangered-species management. In Population Viability Analysis (eds Beissinger, S. R. & McCullough, D. R.) 521–550 (University of Chicago Press, 2002).