Author:
Raysmith Benjamin P.,Timpka Toomas,Jacobsson Jenny,Drew Michael K.,Dahlström Örjan
Abstract
AbstractIn applied program settings, such as in natural environment control and education, performance evaluation is usually conducted by evaluators considering both self-comparison and comparison with peers. We have developed the performance outcome scoring template (POS-T) for assessments with high face-validity in these settings. POS-T puts achievements of individuals or groups in context, i.e. the resulting performance outcome score (POS) reflects a meaningful measure of performance magnitude with regards to internal and external comparisons. Development of a POS is performed in four steps supported by a statistical framework. Software is supplied for creation of scoring applications in different performance evaluation settings. We demonstrate the POS-T by evaluation of CO2 emissions reduction amongst 36 OECD member countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Performance Evaluation Methods: Measurement and Attribution of Program Results (Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat, Toronto, 1998).
2. DeGroff, A., Schooley, M., Chapel, T. & Poister, T. H. Challenges and strategies in applying performance measurement to federal public health programs. Eval. Program Plan. 33, 365–372 (2010).
3. Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships (U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-11–646SP, Washington DC, 2011).
4. de Lancer Julnes, P. Performance measurement: An effective tool for government accountability? The debate goes on. Evaluation 12, 219–235 (2006).
5. AbuJbara, N. K. & Worley, J. A. Performance measurement indicators in the healthcare industry: A systematic review. Glob. Bus. Econ. Rev. 21, 43–68 (2019).