Author:
Tatsuta Kyota,Sakata Mayu,Sugiyama Kosuke,Kojima Tadahiro,Akai Toshiya,Suzuki Katsunori,Torii Kakeru,Morita Yoshifumi,Kikuchi Hirotoshi,Hiramatsu Yoshihiro,Kurachi Kiyotaka,Takeuchi Hiroya
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of shear stress on surgery-related sacral pressure injury (PI) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position. We included 37 patients who underwent this procedure between November 2021 and October 2022. The primary outcome was average horizontal shear stress caused by the rotation of the operating table during the operation, and the secondary outcome was interface pressure over time. Sensors were used to measure shear stress and interface pressure in the sacral region. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of PI. PI had an incidence of 32.4%, and the primary outcome, average horizontal shear stress, was significantly higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group. The interface pressure increased over time in both groups. At 120 min, the interface pressure was two times higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group (PI group, 221.5 mmHg; no-PI group, 86.0 mmHg; p < 0.01). This study suggested that shear stress resulting from rotation of the operating table in the sacral region by laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position is the cause of PI. These results should contribute to the prevention of PI.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Kottner, J. et al. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: The protocol for the second update of the international Clinical Practice Guideline 2019. J. Tissue Viability 28, 51–58 (2019).
2. Nasiri, E., Mollaei, A., Birami, M., Lotfi, M. & Rafiei, M. H. The risk of surgery-related pressure ulcer in diabetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Med. Surg. Lond. 65, 102336 (2021).
3. Kim, J. Y. & Lee, H. H. Risk factors associated with pressure injuries in surgical patients: A retrospective case-control study. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 49, 511–517 (2022).
4. Menšíková, A. et al. Perioperative management of pressure injury: A best practice implementation project. JBI Evid. Implement. 20, S59–S66 (2022).
5. Spector, W. D., Limcangco, R., Owens, P. L. & Steiner, C. A. Marginal hospital cost of surgery-related hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Med. Care 54, 845–851 (2016).