Author:
Chen Feng,Du Jinyang,Lv Jinguo,Tang Chun’an,Pan Yishan
Abstract
AbstractThe study of rock burst tendency of rock masses with different sizes plays a key role in the prevention of rock burst. Through theoretical analysis, it is proposed that uniaxial compressive strength and deformation modulus ratio are the key mechanical parameters affecting rock burst occurrence. In order to find out the size effect of uniaxial compressive strength and deformation modulus ratio, theoretical analysis and uniaxial compression experiment are carried out on rock samples with different heights, different cross-sectional areas and different volumes. The results show that the smaller the uniaxial compressive strength is, the larger the deformation modulus ratio is, and the more likely rock burst are to occur. On the contrary, rock burst is still not easy to generate. The uniaxial compressive strength of rock samples with different heights, different cross-sectional areas and different volumes increases with the increase of rock sample size. The deformation modulus ratio of rock samples with different heights and different volumes shows an upward trend on the whole, while that of rock samples with different cross-sectional areas shows a downward trend on the whole. The fracture forms of rock are analyzed using the energy conversion law in the process of deformation and failure for three kinds of rock with different shapes and sizes.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Frith, R., Reed, G. & Jones, A. A causation mechanism for coal bursts during roadway development based on the major horizontal stress in coal: Very specific structural geology causing a localised loss of effective coal confinement and Newton’s second law. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 39–47 (2020).
2. Song, D. et al. A dynamic ejection coal burst model for coalmine roadway collapse. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 29(4), 557–564 (2019).
3. Wen, J. et al. Rock burst risk evaluation based on equivalent surrounding rock strength. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 29(4), 571–576 (2019).
4. Jiang, Y. D., Pan, Y. S., Jiang, F. X., Dou, L. M. & Ju, Y. State of the art review on mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China. J. China Coal Soc. 39(2), 205–213 (2014).
5. Cai, W. et al. A new seismic-based strain energy methodology for coal burst forecasting in underground coal mines. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 123, 104086 (2019).