Author:
Jung Eui Cheol,Lee Gyu-Han,Shim Eun Bo,Ha Hojin
Abstract
AbstractComputational fluid dynamics has been widely used to study hemodynamics, but accurately determining boundary conditions for turbulent blood flow remains challenging. This study aims to investigate the effect of patient-specific turbulence boundary conditions on the accuracy of turbulent flow simulation. Using a stenosis model with 50% severity in diameter, the post-stenosis turbulence flow region was simulated with different planes to obtain inlet boundary conditions and simulate downstream flows. The errors of simulated flow fields obtained with turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) boundary data and arbitrary turbulence intensity were compared. Additionally, the study tested various TKE data resolutions and noise levels to simulate experimental environments. The mean absolute error of velocity and TKE was investigated with various turbulence intensities and TKE mapping. While voxel size and signal-to-noise ratio of the TKE data affected the results, simulation with SNR > 5 and voxel size < 10% resulted in better accuracy than simulations with turbulence intensities. The simulation with appropriate TKE boundary data resulted in a more accurate velocity and turbulence field than those with arbitrary turbulence intensity boundary conditions. The study demonstrated the potential improvement of turbulent blood flow simulation with patient-specific turbulence boundary conditions, which can be obtained from recent measurement techniques.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Gorlin, R. & Gorlin, S. G. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am. Heart J. 41(1), 1–29 (1951).
2. Carabello, B. A. Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(9), 677–682 (2002).
3. Weyman, A. E. & Scherrer-Crosbie, M. Aortic stenosis: Physics and physiology–what do the numbers really mean?. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 6(1), 23–32 (2005).
4. Guzzardi, D. G. et al. Valve-related hemodynamics mediate human bicuspid aortopathy: insights from wall shear stress mapping. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66(8), 892–900 (2015).
5. Pasta, S. et al. Shear stress and aortic strain associations with biomarkers of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 110(5), 1595–1604 (2020).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献