Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risks

Author:

Franks Daniel M.,Stringer Martin,Torres-Cruz Luis A.,Baker Elaine,Valenta Rick,Thygesen Kristina,Matthews Adam,Howchin John,Barrie Stephen

Abstract

AbstractTailings facility failures represent a significant risk to the environment and communities globally, but until now little data was available on the global distribution of risks and characteristics of facilities to ensure proper governance. We conducted a survey and compiled a database with information on tailings facilities disclosed by extractive companies at the request of institutional investors. Despite limitations in the data, this information disclosure request represents the most comprehensive survey of tailings facilities ever undertaken. The compiled dataset includes 1743 tailings facilities and provides insights into a range of topics including construction method, stability, consequence of failure, stored volume, and the rate of uptake of alternative technologies to dewater tailings and reduce geotechnical risk. Our analysis reveals that 10 per cent of tailings facilities reported notable stability concerns or failure to be confirmed or certified as stable at some point in their history, with distinct trends according to construction method, governance, age, height, volume and seismic hazard. Controversy has surrounded the safety of tailings facilities, most notably upstream facilities, for many years but in the absence of definitive empirical data differentiating the risks of different facility types, upstream facilities have continued to be used widely by the industry and a consensus has emerged that upstream facilities can theoretically be built safely under the right circumstances. Our findings reveal that in practice active upstream facilities report a higher incidence of stability issues (18.3%) than other facility types, and that this elevated risk persists even when these facilities are built in high governance settings. In-pit/natural landform and dry-stack facilities report lower incidence of stability issues, though the rate of stability issues is significant by engineering standards (> 2 per cent) across all construction methods, highlighting the universal importance of careful facility management and governance. The insights reported here can assist the global governance of tailings facility stability risks.

Funder

Investor Mining and Tailings Safety Initiative

United Nations Environment Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference20 articles.

1. Roche, C., Thygesen, K., Baker, E. Mine tailings storage: Safety is no accident. A UNEP rapid response assessment. (UNEP and GRID-Arendal, 2017).

2. Franks, D. M., Boger, D. V., Côte, C. M. & Mulligan, D. R. Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes. Resour. Policy 36(2), 114–122 (2011).

3. Santamarina, J. C., Torres-Cruz, L. A. & Bachus, R. C. Why coal ash and tailings dam disasters occur. Science 364(6440), 526–528 (2019).

4. Church of England Pensions Board (CoE) and Council on Ethics of the Swedish National Pension Funds, “Letter to Board Chairs and Chief Executive Officers of listed extractive companies” (April 5, 2019 https://bit.ly/3aJH9Sq, 2019a).

5. Morgenstern, N.R., Vick, S.G., Van Zyl, D. Report on Mount Polley tailings storage facility breach (Independent Expert Engineering Investigation and Review Panel, January 30, Government of British Columbia, 2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3