Gut microbiome diversity of porcine peritonitis model of sepsis
-
Published:2022-10-19
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Chalupova Miroslava,Horak Jan,Kramna Lenka,Nalos Lukas,Stengl Milan,Chudejova Katerina,Kraftova Lucie,Cinek Ondrej,Klein Pavel,Matejovic Martin,Hrabak Jaroslav
Abstract
AbstractAnimal models are essential in understanding of the mechanisms of sepsis moreover the development and the assessment of emerging therapies. In clinically relevant porcine model, however, a significant variability in the host response has been observed among animals. Thus, there is a strong demand to better understand the potential sources of this heterogeneity. In this study, we compared faecal microbiome composition of 12 animals. Three samples were collected at different time points from each animal. Bacteriome was subjected to 16S rDNA profiling. A significant difference in bacterial composition was associated with the season (p < 0.001) but not with the sex of the pig (p = 0.28), the timing of sample collection (p = 0.59), or interactions thereof (all p > 0.3). The season batch explained 55% of the total variance in the bacteriome diversity. The season term was highly significant from the high-resolution level of the bacterial amplicon sequencing variants up to the level of phylum. The diversity of the microbiome composition could significantly influence experimental model of sepsis, and studies are warranted to demonstrate the effects of gut microbiome diversity on the host-response. If confirmed, control of the gut microbiome should become a standard part of the pre-clinical sepsis experiments.
Funder
Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference27 articles.
1. Singer, M. The new sepsis consensus definitions (Sepsis-3): The good, the not-so-bad, and the actually-quite-pretty. Intensive Care Med. 42, 2027–2029 (2016).
2. Fleischmann, C. et al. Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 113, 159–166 (2016).
3. Iba, T., Connors, J. M., Nagaoka, I. & Levy, J. H. Recent advances in the research and management of sepsis-associated DIC. Int. J. Hematol. 2, 1–10 (2021).
4. Lonsdale, D. O., Shah, R. V. & Lipman, J. Infection, sepsis and the inflammatory response: Mechanisms and therapy. Front. Med. 7, 588863 (2020).
5. Patel, A. & Nunnally, M. E. The septic patient. Anesthesiol. Clin. 38, 889–899 (2020).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献