Author:
Qiao Qinbo,Mairlot Caroline,Bendor Daniel
Abstract
AbstractOur brain’s capacity for memory storage may be vast but is still finite. Given that we cannot remember the entirety of our experiences, how does our brain select what to remember and what to forget? Much like the triage of a hospital’s emergency room, where urgent cases are prioritized and less critical patients receive delayed or even no care, the brain is believed to go through a similar process of memory triage. Recent salient memories are prioritized for consolidation, which helps create stable, long-term representations in the brain; less salient memories receive a lower priority, and are eventually forgotten if not sufficiently consolidated (Stickgold and Walker in Nat Neurosci 16(2):139–145, 2013). While rodents are a primary model for studying memory consolidation, common behavioral tests typically rely on a limited number of items or contexts, well within the memory capacity of the subject. A memory test allowing us to exceed an animal’s memory capacity is key to investigating how memories are selectively strengthened or forgotten. Here we report a new serial novel object recognition task designed to measure memory capacity and prioritization, which we test and validate using female mice.
Funder
European Research Council
Human Frontier Science Program
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Ebbinghaus, H. Über das Gedchtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; the English edition is Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory. A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (Teachers College, Columbia University (Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999), New York, 1885).
2. Greene, A. J., Prepscius, C. & Levy, W. B. Primacy versus recency in a quantitative model: activity is the critical distinction. Learn. Mem. 7, 48–57 (2000).
3. Murdock, Jr. & Bennet, B. The serial position effect of free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 64(5), 482–488 (1962).
4. Daniel, T. A. & Katz, J. S. Primacy and recency effects for taste. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 44(3), 399–405 (2018).
5. Korsnes, M. S., Magnussen, S. & Reinvang, I. Serial position effects in visual short-term memory for words and abstract spatial patterns. Scand. J. Psychol. 37, 62–73 (1996).