Author:
Meena Mintu Ram,Kumar Ravinder,Ramaiyan Karuppaiyan,Chhabra Manohar Lal,Raja Arun Kumar,Krishnasamy Mohanraj,Kulshreshtha Neeraj,Pandey Shashi Kant,Ram Bakshi
Abstract
AbstractSugarcane-derived biomass is a promising source of renewable energy to meet the growing demands for biofuel. Currently, modern sugarcane cultivars are unable to provide enough biomass due to their narrow genetic base and susceptibility to abiotic and biotic stresses. We have evaluated total of 23 hybrids derived from diverse genetic backgrounds of different Saccharum spp. and allied genera, one inbred and compared with commercial checks. Intergeneric hybrids (IGHs) KGS 99-100 and GU 04-432, produced significantly higher biomass (43.37 t ha−1 and 35.24 t ha−1, respectively) than commercial sugarcane have genes derived from Erianthus arundinaceus. Interspecific hybrids (ISHs) GU 07-3704 and 99-489, also produced significantly higher amounts of biomass (37.24 t ha−1 and 33.25 t ha−1, respectively) than commercial checks have genes from S. officinarum and S. spontaneum backgrounds. ISHs recorded significantly higher biomass yield, number of stalks and total dry matter percentage whereas, IGH group recorded significantly higher fibre percent. Furthermore, the clones resistant to red rot and sugarcane borers were identified. The estimated energy value for seven hybrid clones was found to be very high. Cluster analysis of genetic traits revealed two major clusters in traits improving biomass. Our study has revealed that the genetic diversity present in these hybrids could be used for improving biomass production and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in cultivated sugarcanes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J. & Rooney, D. W. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w (2020).
2. FAO. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E. (2019).
3. Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 153–159 (2008).
4. Singels, A., Smit, M. A., Redshaw, K. A. & Donaldson, R. A. The effect of crop start date, crop class and cultivar on sugarcane canopy development and radiation interception. F. Crop. Res. 92, 249–260 (2005).
5. Botha, F. C. Energy yield and cost in a sugarcane biomass system. in 31st Annual Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference 2009, ASSCT 2009 134–143 (Proceeding of Australian Society Sugarcane Technologists, 2009).