Author:
Tian Yu-Jing,Chen Chen,Zhang Xiao-Han,Cao Yu-Juan,Yu Ying-Qing
Abstract
AbstractTraditional vision screenings in schools are limited to simple visual tasks, yet students in their daily learning face more complex visual environments. Binocular rivalry tasks can partially simulate the visual challenges of real visual environments and activate advanced visual processing mechanisms that simple visual tasks cannot. Therefore, by superimposing binocular rivalry-state tasks onto simple visual tasks, we have developed an innovative vision screening program to rapidly and extensively assess students’ visual performance in complex environments. This is a cross-sectional study in which we investigated the performance of 1126 grade 1–6 students from a primary school in Wuxi, China, in rivalry-state stereoscopic vision tasks. The correlation between the screening results of 1044 students and their academic achievements was also statistically analyzed. The study results revealed pass rates of 53.5–60.5% across various visual tests. Specifically, for first-grade students, there was a statistically significant difference in standardized Chinese scores between the group that failed and the group that passed the rivalry-state stereoscopic vision test (− 0.49 ± 3.42 vs. 0.22 ± 0.58, t = − 2.081, P = 0.04). This result underscores the importance of focusing on the visual adaptability of first graders in complex environments.Trail registration: Ethics Committee of Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Jiangnan University-Certificate number: WXCH2022-04-027
Funder
Guiding Project of Wuxi Science and Technology Bureau
Maternal and Child Health Research Project of Wuxi Health Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Junghans, B., Kiely, P. M., Crewther, D. P. & Crewther, S. G. Referral rates for a functional vision screening among a large cosmopolitan sample of Australian children. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 22(1), 10–25 (2002).
2. Mutti, D. O. To emmetropize or not to emmetropize? The question for hyperopic development. Optom. Vis. Sci. 84(2), 97–102 (2007).
3. Hopkins, S., Sampson, G. P., Hendicott, P. & Wood, J. M. Review of guidelines for children’s vision screenings. Clin. Exp. Optom. 96(5), 443–449 (2013).
4. Garzia, R. P. et al. Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline: Care of the patient with learning related vision problems 7–8 (American Optometric Association, 2008).
5. Goldstand, S., Koslowe, K. C. & Parush, S. Vision, visual-information processing, and academic performance among seventh-grade schoolchildren: A more significant relationship than we thought?. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 59(4), 377–389 (2005).