Author:
Gaya Heather E.,Ketz Alison C.
Abstract
AbstractHierarchical models are common for ecological analysis, but determining appropriate model selection methods remains an ongoing challenge. To confront this challenge, a suitable method is needed to evaluate and compare available candidate models. We compared performance of conditional WAIC, a joint-likelihood approach to WAIC (WAICj), and posterior-predictive loss for selecting between candidate N-mixture models. We tested these model selection criteria on simulated single-season N-mixture models, simulated multi-season N-mixture models with temporal auto-correlation, and three case studies of single-season N-mixture models based on eBird data. WAICj proved more accurate than the standard conditional formulation or posterior-predictive loss, even when models were temporally correlated, suggesting WAICj is a robust alternative to model selection for N-mixture models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2. ed., [4. printing] edn. (Springer, 2002).
2. Dey, S., Delampady, M. & Gopalaswamy, A. M. Bayesian model selection for spatial capture-recapture models. Ecol. Evolut. 9, 11569–11583 (2019).
3. Tredennick, A. T., Hooker, G., Ellner, S. P. & Adler, P. B. A practical guide to selecting models for exploration, inference, and prediction in ecology. Ecology 102, e03336 (2021).
4. Hilborn, R. & Mangel, M. The ecological detective: Confronting models with data Nachdr. edn. No. 28 in Monographs in population biology (Princeton Univ.Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997).
5. Hooten, M. B. & Hobbs, N. T. A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 3–28 (2015).