Author:
Silva Davila Esmelinda Oliveira,Costa Romario Martins,Campos Janaira Rocha,Rocha Sandra Mara Barbosa,de Araujo Pereira Arthur Prudencio,Melo Vania Maria Maciel,Oliveira Francisca Andrea Silva,de Alcantara Neto Francisco,Mendes Lucas William,Araujo Ademir Sergio Ferreira
Abstract
AbstractLand degradation by deforestation adversely impacts soil properties, and long-term restoration practices have been reported to potentially reverse these effects, particularly on soil microorganisms. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the short-term effects of restoration on the soil bacterial community in semiarid areas. This study evaluates the bacterial community in soils experiencing degradation (due to slash-and-burn deforestation) and restoration (utilizing stone cordons and revegetation), in comparison to a native soil in the Brazilian semiarid region. Three areas were selected: (a) under degradation; (b) undergoing short-term restoration; and (c) a native area, and the bacterial community was assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing on soil samples collected during both dry and rainy seasons. The dry and rainy seasons exhibited distinct bacterial patterns, and native sites differed from degraded and restoration sites. Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria phyla exhibited higher prevalence in degraded and restoration sites, respectively, while Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were more abundant in sites undergoing restoration compared to degraded sites. Microbial connections varied across sites and seasons, with an increase in nodes observed in the native site during the dry season, more edges and positive connections in the restoration site, and a higher occurrence of negative connections in the degradation site during the rainy season. Niche occupancy analysis revealed that degradation favored specialists over generalists, whereas restoration exhibited a higher prevalence of generalists compared to native sites. Specifically, degraded sites showed a higher abundance of specialists in contrast to restoration sites. This study reveals that land degradation impacts the soil bacterial community, leading to differences between native and degraded sites. Restoring the soil over a short period alters the status of the bacterial community in degraded soil, fostering an increase in generalist microbes that contribute to enhanced soil stability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. United Nations. Brazil sets up a novel model to reverse desertification. In Desertification. Sustainable Land Management & Restoration. https://www.unccd.int/news-events/brazil-sets-novel-model-reverse-desertification (2023).
2. Barbut, M. & Alexander, S. Land degradation as a security threat amplifier: The new global frontline. In Land Restoration (eds Chabay, I. et al.) 3–12 (Academic Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801231-4.00001-X.
3. AbdelRahman, M. A. E. An overview of land degradation, desertification and sustainable land management using GIS and remote sensing applications. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-023-01155-3 (2023).
4. Kraamwinkel, C. T. et al. Planetary limits to soil degradation. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00323-3 (2021).
5. Svejcar, L. N. & Kildisheva, O. A. The age of restoration: Challenges presented by dryland systems. Plant Ecol. 218, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0694-6 (2017).