Author:
Yin Yuan,Han Ji,Childs Peter R. N.
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to take higher-education students as examples to understand and compare artistic and engineering mindsets in creative processes using EEG. Fifteen Master of Fine Arts (MFA) visual arts and fifteen Master of Engineering (MEng) design engineering students were recruited and asked to complete alternative uses tasks wearing an EEG headset. The results revealed that (1) the engineering-mindset students responded to creative ideas faster than artistic-mindset students. (2) Although in creative processes both artistic- and engineering-mindset students showed Theta, Alpha, and Beta wave activity, the active brain areas are slightly different. The active brain areas of artistic-mindset students in creative processes are mainly in the frontal and occipital lobes; while the whole brain (frontal, oriental, temporal, and occipital lobes) was active in creative processes of engineering-mindset students. (3) During the whole creative process, the brain active level of artistic-mindset students was higher than that of engineering-mindset students. The results of this study fills gaps in existing research where only active brain areas and band waves were compared between artistic- and engineering-mindset students in creative processes. For quick thinking in terms of fluency of generating creative ideas, engineering students have an advantage in comparison to those from the visual arts. Also, the study provided more evidence that mindset can affect the active levels of the brain areas. Finally, this study provides educators with more insights on how to stimulate students’ creative ability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Childs, P. et al. The creativity diamond—A framework to aid creativity. J. Intell. 10(4), 73 (2022).
2. Yin, Y., Zuo, H. & Childs, P. R. An EEG-based method to decode cognitive factors in creative processes. AI EDAM 37, e12 (2023).
3. Karwowski, M. & Brzeski, A. Creative mindsets: Prospects and challenges. Creative Self 32, 367–383 (2017).
4. Dweck, C. S. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (Psychology Press, 2013).
5. Puente-Diaz, R. & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. Creative mindsets and their affective and social consequences: A latent class approach. J. Creative Behav. 53(4), 415–426 (2019).