Abstract
AbstractThe genetic composition of an individual can markedly affect its survival, reproduction, and ultimately fitness. As some wildlife populations become smaller, conserving genetic diversity will be a conservation challenge. Many imperiled species are already supported through population augmentation efforts and we often do not know if or how genetic diversity is maintained in translocated species. As a case study for understanding the maintenance of genetic diversity in augmented populations, I wanted to know if genetic diversity (i.e., observed heterozygosity) remained high in a population of gray wolves in the Rocky Mountains of the U.S. > 20 years after reintroduction. Additionally, I wanted to know if a potential mechanism for such diversity was individuals with below average genetic diversity choosing mates with above average diversity. I also asked whether there was a preference for mating with unrelated individuals. Finally, I hypothesized that mated pairs with above average heterozygosity would have increased survival of young. Ultimately, I found that females with below average heterozygosity did not choose mates with above average heterozygosity and wolves chose mates randomly with respect to genetic relatedness. Pup survival was not higher for mated pairs with above average heterozygosity in my models. The dominant variables predicting pup survival were harvest rate during their first year of life and years pairs were mated. Ultimately, genetic diversity was relatively unchanged > 20 years after reintroduction. The mechanism for maintaining such diversity does not appear related to individuals preferentially choosing more genetically diverse mates. Inbreeding avoidance, however, appears to be at least one mechanism maintaining genetic diversity in this population.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Allendorf, F. W., Luikart, G. & Aitken, S. N. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations (Wiley, 2013).
2. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Hered 83, 260–270 (1999).
3. Liberg, O. et al. Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf Canis lupus population. Biol. Lett. 1, 17–20 (2005).
4. Frankham, R. Inbreeding in the wild really does matter. Hered 104, 124 (2010).
5. Janicke, T., Vellnow, N., Lamy, T., Chapuis, E. & David, P. Inbreeding depression of mating behavior and its reproductive consequences in a freshwater snail. Behav. Ecol. 25, 288–299 (2014).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献