Author:
Marr Lisa,Haller Bernhard,Pyka Thomas,Peeken Jan C.,Jesinghaus Moritz,Scheidhauer Klemens,Friess Helmut,Combs Stephanie E.,Münch Stefan
Abstract
AbstractAim of this study was to validate the prognostic impact of clinical parameters and baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT derived textural features to predict histopathologic response and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and surgery. Between 2005 and 2014, 38 ESCC were treated with nCRT and surgery. For all patients, the 18F-FDG-PET-derived parameters metabolic tumor volume (MTV), SUVmax, contrast and busyness were calculated for the primary tumor using a SUV-threshold of 3. The parameter uniformity was calculated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Based on histopathological response to nCRT, patients were classified as good responders (< 10% residual tumor) (R) or non-responders (≥ 10% residual tumor) (NR). Regression analyses were used to analyse the association of clinical parameters and imaging parameters with treatment response and overall survival (OS). Good response to nCRT was seen in 27 patients (71.1%) and non-response was seen in 11 patients (28.9%). Grading was the only parameter predicting response to nCRT (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.188, 95% CI: 0.040–0.883; p = 0.034). No association with histopathologic treatment response was seen for any of the evaluated imaging parameters including SUVmax, MTV, busyness, contrast and uniformity. Using multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the heterogeneity parameters busyness (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.424, 95% CI: 1.044–1.943; p = 0.026) and contrast (HR = 6.678, 95% CI: 1.969–22.643;p = 0.002) were independently associated with OS, while no independent association with OS was seen for SUVmax and MTV. In patients with ESCC undergoing nCRT and surgery, baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT derived parameters could not predict histopathologic response to nCRT. However, the PET/CT derived features busyness and contrast were independently associated with OS and should be further investigated.
Funder
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
2. Pennathur, A. et al. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 381, 400–412 (2013).
3. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft DK, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adeno-karzinome des Ösophagus, Langversion 2.0, 2018, AWMF Registernummer: 021/023OLhttps://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/oesophaguskarzi-nom/(Accessed December 14, 2019).
4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (Version 3.2019). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2019.
5. Tepper, J. et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 1086–1092 (2008).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献