Abstract
AbstractWe evaluated the rate of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in a group invited to a screening program compared to the rates in two groups who received usual care. The population eligible for screening was all children in Iceland registered for their 30-month well-child visits at primary healthcare centers (PHCs) from March 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017 (N = 7173). The PHCs in the capital area of Reykjavik were the units of cluster randomization. Nine PHCs were selected for intervention (invited group), while eight PHCs received usual care (control group 1). PHCs outside the capital area were without randomization (control group 2). An interdisciplinary team, including a pediatrician contributing with physical and neurological examination, a psychologist evaluating autism symptoms using a diagnostic instrument, and a social worker interviewing the parents, reached a consensus on the clinical diagnosis of ASD according to the ICD-10 diagnostic system. Children in the population were followed up for at least two years and 119 cases were identified. The overall cumulative incidence of ASD was 1.66 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37, 1.99). In the invited group the incidence rate was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.60, 2.78); in control group 1, the rate was 1.83 (95% CI: 1.31, 2.50); and in control group 2, the rate was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.50). Although the rate of ASD was higher in the invited group than in the control groups, the wide confidence intervals prevented us from concluding definitively that the screening detected ASD more readily than usual care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Garcia-Primo, P. et al. Screening for autism spectrum disorders: State of the art in Europe. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 23(11), 1005–1021 (2014).
2. Soto, S. et al. A review of cultural adaptations of screening tools for autism spectrum disorders. Autism 19(6), 646–661 (2015).
3. Stewart, L. A. & Lee, L. C. Screening for autism spectrum disorder in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Autism 21(5), 527–539 (2017).
4. Robins, D. L., Fein, D. & Barton, M. The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F). https://mchatscreen.com/ (2009).
5. Guo, C. et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F). J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49(1), 185–196 (2019).