Author:
Waniek Marcin,Raman Gururaghav,AlShebli Bedoor,Peng Jimmy Chih-Hsien,Rahwan Talal
Abstract
AbstractDisinformation continues to raise concerns due to its increasing threat to society. Nevertheless, a threat of a disinformation-based attack on critical infrastructure is often overlooked. Here, we consider urban traffic networks and focus on fake information that manipulates drivers’ decisions to create congestion at a city scale. Specifically, we consider two complementary scenarios, one where drivers are persuaded to move towards a given location, and another where they are persuaded to move away from it. We study the optimization problem faced by the adversary when choosing which streets to target to maximize disruption. We prove that finding an optimal solution is computationally intractable, implying that the adversary has no choice but to settle for suboptimal heuristics. We analyze one such heuristic, and compare the cases when targets are spread across the city of Chicago vs. concentrated in its business district. Surprisingly, the latter results in more far-reaching disruption, with its impact felt as far as 2 km from the closest target. Our findings demonstrate that vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure may arise not only from hardware and software, but also from behavioral manipulation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018).
2. David, M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018).
3. Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L. & Nielsen, R.K. Measuring the reach of “fake news” and online disinformation in Europe. Reuters institute factsheet (2018).
4. Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(7), 2521–2526 (2019).
5. The New York Times. How Trump consultants exploited the facebook data of millions. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html. (2018).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献