Author:
Ahmad Saeed,Hussain Ijaz,Ghaffar Abdul,Rahman Muhammad Habib ur,Saleem Muhammad Zain,Yonas Muhammad Waqas,Hussnain Hammad,Ikram Rao Muhammad,Arslan Muhammad
Abstract
AbstractLong-term different tillage system field trials can provide vital knowledge about sustainable changes in soil health indices and crop productivity. This study examined cotton productivity and soil health indices under different tillage systems and organic materials. The present study was carried out at MNS University of Agriculture, Multan to explore the effect of different tillage systems: conventional tillage (T1), conservation tillage (T2), and organic materials: control (recommended dose of synthetic fertilizers; 160:90:60 kg ha−1NPK), poultry manure (10 t ha−1 PM), compost (10 t ha−1 CM), farmyard manure (20 t ha−1 FYM), and biochar (7 t ha−1 BC) on cotton productivity and soil health indices. Two years field trials showed that different tillage systems and organic materials significantly improved the growth, morphological, and yield attributes of cotton and soil health indices. The cotton showed highest seed cotton yield (3692–3736 kg ha−1), and soil organic matter (0.809–0.815%), soil available nitrogen (74.3–74.6 mg kg−1), phosphorus (7.29–7.43 mg kg−1), and potassium (213–216 mg kg−1) under T2 in comparison to T1 system during both years of field experiment, respectively. Similarly, PM (10 t ha−1) showed highest seed cotton yield (3888–3933 kg ha−1), and soil organic matter (0.794–0.797%), nitrogen (74.7–75.0 mg kg−1), phosphorus (7.39–7.55 mg kg−1), and potassium (221–223 mg kg−1) when these are compared to FYM (20 t ha−1), CM (10 t ha−1), and BC (7 t ha−1) during both years of field experiment, respectively. These findings indicate that conservation tillage system with application of 10 t ha−1 PM are the best practices for the sustainable cotton production and to ensure improvement in the soil health indices under arid climatic conditions.
Funder
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Ijaz, M. et al. Alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. Agric. Waste. Apple Acad. Press. 9, 253–273 (2021).
2. Rai, S. & Shukla, N. Biofertilizer: An alternative of synthetic fertilizers. J. Plant Arch. 20, 1374–1379 (2020).
3. Ahmed, M., Rauf, M., Mukhtar, Z. & Saeed, N. A. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 24(35), 26983–26987 (2017).
4. Khan, A. et al. Nitrogen nutrition in cotton and control strategies for greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 24(30), 23471–23487 (2017).
5. Karthik, A., Duraisamy, V. K. & Prakash, A. H. Influence of different sources of biochar on soil physical and chemical properties in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 8, 2051–2055 (2019).