Author:
Wang Guandong,Alais David
Abstract
AbstractOrientation processing is one of the most fundamental functions in both visual and somatosensory perception. Converging findings suggest that orientation processing in both modalities is closely linked: somatosensory neurons share a similar orientation organisation as visual neurons, and the visual cortex has been found to be heavily involved in tactile orientation perception. Hence, we hypothesized that somatosensation would exhibit a similar orientation adaptation effect, and this adaptation effect would be transferable between the two modalities, considering the above-mentioned connection. The tilt aftereffect (TAE) is a demonstration of orientation adaptation and is used widely in behavioural experiments to investigate orientation mechanisms in vision. By testing the classic TAE paradigm in both tactile and crossmodal orientation tasks between vision and touch, we were able to show that tactile perception of orientation shows a very robust TAE, similar to its visual counterpart. We further show that orientation adaptation in touch transfers to produce a TAE when tested in vision, but not vice versa. Additionally, when examining the test sequence following adaptation for serial effects, we observed another asymmetry between the two conditions where the visual test sequence displayed a repulsive intramodal serial dependence effect while the tactile test sequence exhibited an attractive serial dependence. These findings provide concrete evidence that vision and touch engage a similar orientation processing mechanism. However, the asymmetry in the crossmodal transfer of TAE and serial dependence points to a non-reciprocal connection between the two modalities, providing further insights into the underlying processing mechanism.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference98 articles.
1. Graham, N. V. S. Visual Pattern Analyzers (Oxford University Press, 1989).
2. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Brain and visual perception: the story of a 25-year collaboration (Oxford University Press, 2004).
3. De Valois, R. & De Valois, K. Spatial Vision. Oxford Psychology Series (Oxford University Press, 1990).
4. Bensmaia, S. J., Denchev, P. V., Dammann, J. F., Craig, J. C. & Hsiao, S. S. The representation of stimulus orientation in the early stages of somatosensory processing. J. Neurosci. 28, 776–786 (2008).
5. Bensmaia, S., Hsiao, S., Denchev, P., Killebrew, J. & Craig, J. The tactile perception of stimulus orientation. Somatosens. Motor Res. 25, 49–59 (2008).