Author:
Assecondi Sara,Hu Rong,Eskes Gail,Pan Xiaoping,Zhou Jin,Shapiro Kim
Abstract
AbstractInterventions to improve working memory, e.g. by combining task rehearsal and non-invasive brain stimulation, are gaining popularity. Many factors, however, affect the outcome of these interventions. We hypothesize that working memory capacity at baseline predicts how an individual performs on a working memory task, by setting limits on the benefit derived from tDCS when combined with strategy instructions; specifically, we hypothesize that individuals with low capacity will benefit the most. Eighty-four participants underwent two sessions of an adaptive working memory task (n-back) on two consecutive days. Participants were split into four independent groups (SHAM vs ACTIVE stimulation and STRATEGY vs no STRATEGY instructions). For the purpose of analysis, individuals were divided based on their baseline working memory capacity. Results support our prediction that the combination of tDCS and strategy instructions is particularly beneficial in low capacity individuals. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting the outcome of tDCS when used in conjunction with cognitive training to improve working memory. Moreover, our results have implications for training regimens, e.g., by designing interventions predicated on baseline cognitive abilities, or focusing on strategy development for specific attentional skills.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Huang, Y.-Z. et al. Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 2318–2329 (2017).
2. Kronberg, G., Rahman, A., Sharma, M., Bikson, M. & Parra, L. C. Direct current stimulation boosts Hebbian plasticity in vitro. Brain Stimul. Basic Transl. Clin. Res. Neuromodul. 13, 287–301 (2020).
3. Shin, Y.-I., Foerster, Á. & Nitsche, M. A. Reprint of: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—application in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia 74, 74–95 (2015).
4. Engle, R. W. Working memory and executive attention: a revisit. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 190–193 (2018).
5. Hahn, E. A. & Lachman, M. E. Everyday experiences of memory problems and control: the adaptive role of selective optimization with compensation in the context of memory decline. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 22, 25–41 (2014).
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献