Author:
Ülkü Soner,Getzmann Stephan,Wascher Edmund,Schneider Daniel
Abstract
AbstractDealing with task interruptions requires the flexible use of working memory and attentional control mechanisms, which are prone to age-related changes. We investigated effects of age on dealing with task interruptions and potential advantages of anticipating an interruption using EEG and a retrospective cueing (retro-cue) paradigm. Thirty-two young (18–30 years) and 28 older (55–70 years) participants performed a visual working memory task, where they had to report the orientation of a target following a retro-cue. Within blocks of 10 trials, they were always, never, or randomly interrupted with an arithmetic task before the onset of the retro-cue. The interruption-induced decline in primary task performance was more pronounced in older participants, while only these benefited from anticipation. The EEG analysis revealed reduced theta and alpha/beta response to the retro-cue following interruptions, especially for the older participants. In both groups, anticipated interruptions were associated with increased theta and alpha/beta power prior and during the interruption, and stronger beta suppression to the retro-cue. The results indicate that interruptions impede the refocusing of attention on the task-relevant representation of the primary task, especially in older people, while anticipation facilitates preparation for the interruption task and resumption of the primary task.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Puranik, H., Koopman, J. & Vough, H. C. Pardon the interruption: An integrative review and future research agenda for research on work interruptions. J. Manage. 46, 806–842 (2020).
2. Naveh-Benjamin, M. & Cowan, N. The roles of attention, executive function and knowledge in cognitive ageing of working memory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00149-0 (2023).
3. Arnau, S., Wascher, E. & Küper, K. Age-related differences in reallocating cognitive resources when dealing with interruptions. Neuroimage 191, 292–302 (2019).
4. Clapp, W. C. & Gazzaley, A. Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 134–148 (2012).
5. Lustig, C. & Jantz, T. Questions of age differences in interference control: When and how, not if?. Brain Res. 1612, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.024 (2015).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献