Author:
Jones Benjamin A.,Goodkind Andrew L.,Berrens Robert P.
Abstract
AbstractThis paper provides economic estimates of the energy-related climate damages of mining Bitcoin (BTC), the dominant proof-of-work cryptocurrency. We provide three sustainability criteria for signaling when the climate damages may be unsustainable. BTC mining fails all three. We find that for 2016–2021: (i) per coin climate damages from BTC were increasing, rather than decreasing with industry maturation; (ii) during certain time periods, BTC climate damages exceed the price of each coin created; (iii) on average, each $1 in BTC market value created was responsible for $0.35 in global climate damages, which as a share of market value is in the range between beef production and crude oil burned as gasoline, and an order-of-magnitude higher than wind and solar power. Taken together, these results represent a set of sustainability red flags. While proponents have offered BTC as representing “digital gold,” from a climate damages perspective it operates more like “digital crude”.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Brekke, J. K. & Fischer, A. Digital scarcity. Internet Policy Rev. https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1548 (2021).
2. Sotheby’s. 2021. NFT’s: Redefining Digital Ownership and Scarcity. Sotheby’s Metaverse, April 6, 2021. https://www.sothebys.com/en/articles/nfts-redefining-digital-ownership-and-scarcity.
3. Brekke, J. K. & Alsindi, W. Z. Cryptoeconomics. Internet Policy Rev. https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1553 (2021).
4. de Vries, A. Bitcoin boom: What rising prices mean for the network’s energy consumption. Joule 5(3), 509–513 (2021).
5. Krause, M. J. & Tolaymat, T. Quantification of energy and carbon costs for mining cryptocurrencies. Nature Sustain. 1(11), 711–718 (2018).
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献