Author:
Stöckl Fabian,Schill Wolf-Peter,Zerrahn Alexander
Abstract
AbstractGreen hydrogen can help to decarbonize parts of the transportation sector, but its power sector interactions are not well understood so far. It may contribute to integrating variable renewable energy sources if production is sufficiently flexible in time. Using an open-source co-optimization model of the power sector and four options for supplying hydrogen at German filling stations, we find a trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility. For lower shares of renewables and hydrogen, more energy-efficient and less flexible small-scale on-site electrolysis is optimal. For higher shares of renewables and/or hydrogen, more flexible but less energy-efficient large-scale hydrogen supply chains gain importance, as they allow to temporally disentangle hydrogen production from demand via storage. Liquid hydrogen emerges as particularly beneficial, followed by liquid organic hydrogen carriers and gaseous hydrogen. Large-scale hydrogen supply chains can deliver substantial power sector benefits, mainly through reduced renewable curtailment. Energy modelers and system planners should consider the distinct flexibility characteristics of hydrogen supply chains in more detail when assessing the role of green hydrogen in future energy transition scenarios. We also propose two alternative cost and emission metrics which could be useful in future analyses.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V. (DIW Berlin)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. de Coninck, H. et al. Strengthening and implementing the global response. In Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_Chapter4_High_Res.pdf [last accessed: Apr. 6, 2020] (2018).
2. Armaroli, N. & Balzani, V. Towards an electricity-powered world. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3193–3222 (2011).
3. Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M. & Hansson, J. Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, Part 2, 1887–1905 (2018).
4. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364(6438), eaav3506 (2019).
5. Staffell, I. et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 463–491 (2019).
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献